Blood pressure control and management of very elderly patients with hypertension in primary care settings in Spain.

This study aimed to determine the clinical profile, blood pressure (BP) control rates, therapeutic management and physicians' therapeutic behavior regarding very elderly hypertensive patients. A total of 1540 hypertensive patients 80 years old on antihypertensive therapy and receiving care in primary care settings in Spain were included in this cross-sectional study. The mean patient age was 83.4±3.1 years, 61.9% of patients were women and 49.3% of patients had cardiovascular disease. Of the patients, 27.7% were on monotherapy and 72.3% were on combined therapy (47.4% on two antihypertensive agents and 24.9% on three or more antihypertensive agents). A total of 40.8% (95% confidence interval (CI): 38.4-43.3%) of patients achieved BP goals (<140/90 mm Hg; <130/80 in patients with diabetes, chronic renal disease or cardiovascular disease). Patients with uncontrolled BP were more likely to have metabolic syndrome, diabetes, obesity, a history of cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, renal disease and stroke and were more frequently smokers. Physicians modified the antihypertensive regimens for 27.4% (95% CI: 23.9-30.8%) of the patients with uncontrolled BP, and the addition of another antihypertensive agent was the most frequent modification. With regard to the physicians' perception of patients' BP control, the BPs of 44.1% of the patients with uncontrolled BP were considered well controlled by the physicians.

Treatment and blood pressure control in Spain during 2002-2010.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the evolution of hypertension management and blood pressure (BP) control in Spain in the last decade across PRESCAP 2002, 2006 and 2010. METHODS: The methodology of the three studies was the same. They were multicenter and cross-sectional surveys aimed to determine BP control rates in hypertensive patients in primary care in Spain during 2002, 2006 and 2010, respectively. In each study, patients at least 18 years, with an established diagnosis of hypertension were included. Adequate BP control was defined as BP less than 140/90 mmHg in the general population (<130/85 mmHg in PRESCAP 2002 and less than 130/80 mmHg in PRESCAP 2006 and PRESCAP 2010 for patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease and cardiovascular disease). RESULTS: A total of 12,754 patients (mean age 63.3 ± 10.8 years; 57.2% women), 10,520 patients (64.6 ± 11.3 years; 53.7% women) and 12,961 patients (66.3 ± 11.4; 52.0% women) were included in PRESCAP 2002, PRESCAP 2006 and PRESCAP 2010 studies respectively. With regard to BP control rates, 36.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.2-36.9%], 41.4% (95% CI 40.5-42.4%) and 46.3% of patients (95% CI 45.4-47.1%) achieved BP goals in PRESCAP 2002, PRESCAP 2006 and PRESCAP 2010, respectively (P < 0.0001). In PRESCAP 2002, 56% of patients were on monotherapy, 35.6% were taking two drugs and 8.4% at least three drugs. In PRESCAP 2006 these numbers were 44.4, 41.1 and 14.5%, respectively, and in PRESCAP 2010 they were 36.4, 44.1 and 19.5%, respectively (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: BP control rates have improved in Spain from 2002 to 2010. This may be related, at least in part, with the higher use of antihypertensive treatment, particularly combined therapy.

Comentarios a las guías de práctica clínica sobre manejo de las dislipemias de la Sociedad Europea de Cardiología y la Sociedad Europea de Aterosclerosis 2011. Un informe del Grupo de Trabajo del Comité de Guías de Práctica Clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología / Comments on the ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias 2011. A report of the Task Force of the Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the Spanish Society of Cardiology

No disponible

Abnormalities in ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in hypertensive patients with diabetes.

Our aim was to assess the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) characteristics or patterns in hypertensive patients with diabetes compared with non-diabetic hypertensives. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of a 68,045 patient database from the Spanish Society of Hypertension ABPM Registry, a nation-wide network of >1200 primary-care physicians performing ABPM under standardized conditions in daily practice. We identified 12,600 (18.5%) hypertensive patients with diabetes. When compared with patients without diabetes, diabetic hypertensives exhibited higher systolic blood pressure (BP) levels in every ABPM period (daytime 135.4 vs. 131.8, and nighttime 126.0 vs. 121.0 mm Hg, P<0.001 for both) despite they were receiving more antihypertensive drugs (mean number 1.71 vs. 1.23, P<0.001). Consequently, diabetic patients suffered from lack of control of BP more frequently than non-diabetic subjects particularly during the night (65.5% vs. 57.4%, P<0.001). Prevalence of a non-dipping BP profile (64.2% vs. 51.6%, P<0.001) was higher in diabetic patients. In the other hand, prevalence of 'white-coat' hypertension in diabetic patients was 33.0%. We conclude that there was a remarkably high prevalence of alterations in ABPM in patients with diabetes. Abnormalities in systolic BP, particularly during the night, and in circadian BP pattern could be linked with the excess of BP-related cardiovascular risk of diabetes. A wider use of ABPM in diabetic patients should be considered.

Control de la presión arterial en las mujeres hipertensas de 65 o más años de edad asistidas en atención primaria. Estudio MERICAP / Blood pressure control in hypertensive women aged 65 years or older in a primary care setting. MERICAP study

Introducción y objetivos. Es necesario tener más información sobre el grado de control de la hipertensión arterial en las mujeres. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar el control de presión arterial y los factores asociados al mal control en hipertensas asistidas en atención primaria. Métodos. Estudio transversal y multicéntrico que incluyó a mujeres de edad ≥ 65 años con diagnóstico establecido de hipertensión arterial. La medición de la presión arterial se realizó siguiendo normas estandarizadas, calculando la media aritmética de dos tomas sucesivas. Se consideró que había buen control cuando el promedio era < 140/90mmHg en general y < 130/80mmHg en pacientes con diabetes mellitus. Resultados. Se incluyó a 4.274 hipertensas; media de edad, 73,6±6,1 años. El 29,8% (intervalo de confianza del 95%, 28,4-31,1%) presentaba buen control de presión arterial sistólica y diastólica. El 67,6% estaba en terapia combinada (el 46,3 dos fármacos y el 21,7% tres o más). La lesión de órgano diana más frecuente fue la hipertrofia ventricular izquierda (33,8%) y la enfermedad clínica asociada más prevalente, la insuficiencia cardiaca (19%). Se observaron diferencias significativas según control de la presión arterial en todos los factores de riesgo cardiovascular, lesión órgano diana y enfermedad clínica asociada (p<0,01). La menor antigüedad de la hipertensión arterial, el colesterol unido a lipoproteínas de baja densidad > 115mg/dl, la glucohemoglobina ≥ 7%, la monoterapia y la obesidad fueron las variables que más se asociaron con mal control (p<0,0001). Conclusiones. Sólo 3 de cada 10 hipertensas de edad ≥ 65 años tenían controlada óptimamente su hipertensión arterial. El mal control se relacionó principalmente con un diagnóstico de hipertensión arterial más reciente (AU)

Introduction and objectives. The available information regarding blood pressure control in women is scarce. This study was aimed at assessing blood pressure control and predictors of a lack of blood pressure control in the primary care setting in a large sample of hypertensive women. Methods. Women aged 65 years or older with an established diagnosis of hypertension (≥6 months of evolution) were included in a cross-sectional, multicenter study. Blood pressure readings were taken following the current guidelines, and the value for each visit was the average of two separate measurements. Adequate blood pressure control was defined as <140/90mmHg (<130/80mmHg for diabetics). Results. A total of 4274 hypertensive women (mean age: 73.6 years [6.1 years]) were included in the study; blood pressure was controlled in 29.8% (95% confidence interval: 28.4%-31.1%) of the study population. Combined therapy was administered in 67.6% of patients (46.3% with 2 drugs and 21.7% with 3 or more drugs). The most common organ damage was left ventricular hypertrophy (33.8%) and the most common associated condition was heart failure (19%). Poor blood pressure control was more frequent in patients with more cardiovascular risk factors, organ damage, and associated clinical conditions (P<.01). A more recent hypertension diagnosis, LDL-cholesterol >115mg/dl, monotherapy, obesity, and hemoglobin A1c ≥7% were associated with a lack of blood pressure control (P<.0001). Conclusions. Only 3 in 10 hypertensive women aged ≥65 years monitored daily in the primary care setting achieved their blood pressure goals. A recent diagnosis of hypertension was the main predictor of poor blood pressure control (AU)

Blood pressure control in hypertensive women aged 65 years or older in a primary care setting. MERICAP study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The available information regarding blood pressure control in women is scarce. This study was aimed at assessing blood pressure control and predictors of a lack of blood pressure control in the primary care setting in a large sample of hypertensive women. METHODS: Women aged 65 years or older with an established diagnosis of hypertension (≥ 6 months of evolution) were included in a cross-sectional, multicenter study. Blood pressure readings were taken following the current guidelines, and the value for each visit was the average of two separate measurements. Adequate blood pressure control was defined as < 140/90 mm Hg (< 130/80 mm Hg for diabetics). RESULTS: A total of 4274 hypertensive women (mean age: 73.6 years [6.1 years]) were included in the study; blood pressure was controlled in 29.8% (95% confidence interval: 28.4%-31.1%) of the study population. Combined therapy was administered in 67.6% of patients (46.3% with 2 drugs and 21.7% with 3 or more drugs). The most common organ damage was left ventricular hypertrophy (33.8%) and the most common associated condition was heart failure (19%). Poor blood pressure control was more frequent in patients with more cardiovascular risk factors, organ damage, and associated clinical conditions (P<.01). A more recent hypertension diagnosis, LDL-cholesterol > 115 mg/dl, monotherapy, obesity, and hemoglobin A(1c) ≥ 7% were associated with a lack of blood pressure control (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Only 3 in 10 hypertensive women aged ≥ 65 years monitored daily in the primary care setting achieved their blood pressure goals. A recent diagnosis of hypertension was the main predictor of poor blood pressure control.

Diferencias entre el control clínico y ambulatorio de la hipertensión arterial en pacientes muy ancianos. Proyecto CARDIORISC–MAPAPRES / Differences between office and ambulatory control of hypertension in very elderly patients. The CARDIORISC – MAPAPRES project

Fundamento y objetivos: La hipertensión arterial (HTA) afecta a la mayoría de la población muy anciana. El objetivo de este estudio fue estimar el grado de control de la HTA según se registre la presión arterial (PA) en la consulta o por monitorización ambulatoria de PA (MAPA). Pacientes y método: Estudio transversal y multicéntrico sobre pacientes hipertensos de 80 o más años de edad con tratamiento farmacológico antihipertensivo incluidos en el proyecto CARDIORISC–MAPAPRES. Entre junio de 2004 y abril de 2007 se obtuvo una base de datos de 33.829 registros de MAPA que cumplieron estándares de calidad preestablecidos. Se definió como buen control clínico a valores de PA menores de 140/90mmHg, y como buen control ambulatorio a valores de PA por MAPA en período de 24h menores de 130/80mmHg.Resultados: Se identificaron 2.311 pacientes (6,8%) de 80 o más años de edad. La edad media fue de 83,1 años (DE de 3,2) y un 63% fueron mujeres. El 21,5% (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: 19,1–23,9) presentó buen control clínico y un 42,1% (IC del 95%: 39,7–45,3) presentó buen control ambulatorio (p<0,001). La prevalencia de HTA enmascarada fue del 7,0% (IC del 95%: 6,0–8,0) y la prevalencia de resistencia aislada en la clínica fue del 27,6% (IC del 95%: 25,7–29,4). La diabetes, la enfermedad renal crónica y la duración de la HTA fueron los factores más asociados al mal control de la HTA (p<0,001) en la MAPA de 24h.Conclusiones: Sólo 2 de cada 10 pacientes muy ancianos hipertensos tuvieron controlada adecuadamente su HTA por medida casual. Sin embargo, prácticamente el doble estaban controlados con el criterio de la MAPA. Estos hallazgos justifican un uso más amplio de la MAPA en el paciente hipertenso de edad muy avanzada (AU)

Background and objective: Hypertension is highly prevalent in the very elderly. We studied control rates of hypertension according to clinic blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in treated hypertensives aged ≥80 years.Patients and method: Data came from the Spanish Society of Hypertension ABPM Registry (CARDIORISC – MAPAPRES project), which comprises a nation-wide network of more than 1,000 physicians sending standardized ABPM registries via web. Between June 2004 and April 2007 we obtained a 33.829-patient database. Control of hypertension was defined at the clinic when office BP was <140/90mmHg and at the ABPM when mean BP during the 24-h period was <130/80mmHg.Results: We identified 2,311 patients (6.8%) aged ≥80 years. Mean age (SD) was 83.1 (3.2) years and 63% were women. Control of clinic BP was observed in 21.5% of cases (95%CI: 19.1–23.9) and control of 24-h BP in ABPM was 42.1% (95%CI: 39.7–45.3). Prevalence of masked hypertension was 7.0% (95%CI: 6.0–8.0) and prevalence of office-resistant control (white coat) was 27.6% (95% CI: 25.7–29.4). Diabetes, kidney disease, and duration of hypertension were associated with lack of control in ABPM. Conclusions: In very old hypertensives, control of clinic BP was 21.5% but ambulatory-based hypertension control was 42.1%. Physicians should be aware that the likelihood of misestimating BP control is high in these subjects. A wider use of ABPM in the elderly with hypertension should be considered (AU)

[Differences between office and ambulatory control of hypertension in very elderly patients. The CARDIORISC - MAPAPRES project]. / Diferencias entre el control clínico y ambulatorio de la hipertensión arterial en pacientes muy ancianos. Proyecto CARDIORISC-MAPAPRES.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hypertension is highly prevalent in the very elderly. We studied control rates of hypertension according to clinic blood pressure (BP) and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in treated hypertensives aged > or =80 years. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Data came from the Spanish Society of Hypertension ABPM Registry (CARDIORISC - MAPAPRES project), which comprises a nation-wide network of more than 1,000 physicians sending standardized ABPM registries via web. Between June 2004 and April 2007 we obtained a 33.829-patient database. Control of hypertension was defined at the clinic when office BP was <140/90mmHg and at the ABPM when mean BP during the 24-h period was <130/80mmHg. RESULTS: We identified 2,311 patients (6.8%) aged > or =80 years. Mean age (SD) was 83.1 (3.2) years and 63% were women. Control of clinic BP was observed in 21.5% of cases (95%CI: 19.1-23.9) and control of 24-h BP in ABPM was 42.1% (95%CI: 39.7-45.3). Prevalence of masked hypertension was 7.0% (95%CI: 6.0-8.0) and prevalence of office-resistant control (white coat) was 27.6% (95% CI: 25.7-29.4). Diabetes, kidney disease, and duration of hypertension were associated with lack of control in ABPM. CONCLUSIONS: In very old hypertensives, control of clinic BP was 21.5% but ambulatory-based hypertension control was 42.1%. Physicians should be aware that the likelihood of misestimating BP control is high in these subjects. A wider use of ABPM in the elderly with hypertension should be considered.

Blood pressure control and physicians' therapeutic behavior in a very elderly Spanish hypertensive population.

This study sought to assess blood pressure (BP) control rates by determining the factors associated with poor BP control, therapeutic management and physicians' therapeutic behavior among elderly Spanish hypertensive patients in a primary care setting. This cross-sectional multicenter study included hypertensive patients at least 80 years of age in primary care settings throughout Spain who were on pharmacologic treatment. BP was considered well controlled at <140/90 mm Hg (<130/80 in patients with diabetes, chronic renal disease or cardiovascular disease). A total of 923 patients were included (83.3+/-3.5 years; 62.9% women). Almost two-thirds (64.0%) of the patients were taking a combined therapy (68.7%; 2 drugs) and approximately one-third (35.6%; 95% CI 32.6-38.7) of the patients attained BP goals. Physicians modified the antihypertensive treatment in 26.1% (95% CI 22.3-29.9) of patients with uncontrolled BP, which most frequently involved the addition of another drug (47.6%). Predictive factors for no BP control and no therapeutic modification in patients with uncontrolled BP included diabetes (OR 2.8 (95% CI 2.0-3.9); P<0.0001) and mistaken physician perceptions about BP control (OR 108.1 (95% CI 40.5-288.6); P<0.0001), respectively. Only three out of 10 hypertensive patients 80 years or older in Spain achieved the BP goals. Physicians only modified the treatment in one out of four patients with uncontrolled BP. Diabetes was associated with a threefold increase in the likelihood of uncontrolled BP, and the mistaken physician perceptions about BP control were associated with a 100-fold rise in the probability of not modifying antihypertensive therapy.

Prevalence and factors associated with circadian blood pressure patterns in hypertensive patients.

Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring has become useful in the diagnosis and management of hypertensive individuals. In addition to 24-hour values, the circadian variation of BP adds prognostic significance in predicting cardiovascular outcome. However, the magnitude of circadian BP patterns in large studies has hardly been noticed. Our aims were to determine the prevalence of circadian BP patterns and to assess clinical conditions associated with the nondipping status in groups of both treated and untreated hypertensive subjects, studied separately. Clinical data and 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring were obtained from 42,947 hypertensive patients included in the Spanish Society of Hypertension Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Registry. They were 8384 previously untreated and 34,563 treated hypertensives. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring was performed with an oscillometric device (SpaceLabs 90207). A nondipping pattern was defined when nocturnal systolic BP dip was <10% of daytime systolic BP. The prevalence of nondipping was 41% in the untreated group and 53% in treated patients. In both groups, advanced age, obesity, diabetes mellitus, and overt cardiovascular or renal disease were associated with a blunted nocturnal BP decline (P<0.001). In treated patients, nondipping was associated with the use of a higher number of antihypertensive drugs but not with the time of the day at which antihypertensive drugs were administered. In conclusion, a blunted nocturnal BP dip (the nondipping pattern) is common in hypertensive patients. A clinical pattern of high cardiovascular risk is associated with nondipping, suggesting that the blunted nocturnal BP dip may be merely a marker of high cardiovascular risk.

The impact of occult renal failure on the cardiovascular risk stratification in an elderly population: the PREV-ICTUS study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the impact of occult renal failure (ORF) in the individual risk stratification and on the blood pressures (BP) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) goals in an aged population, according to the ESH/ESC Hypertension Guidelines. METHODS: A cross-sectional, population-based study on individuals aged 60 years or more carried out in Primary Care Centers of Spain. Kidney function was estimated from calculated creatinine clearance (eGFR), Cockroft and Gault formula. Ten-year cardiovascular risk was estimated through the ESH/ESC table including or not including the eGFR. Estimates of the modification in BP and LDL-cholesterol (cLDL) goals were calculated. RESULTS: In 6419 subjects, 4242 subjects (66%) had normal renal function, 1971 (31%) had ORF (normal creatinine and low eGFR) and 206 (3%) had insufficient renal function (high creatinine and all of them low eGFR). Inclusion of ORF as target organ damage resulted in an increase in the estimated risk in 10.8% of the total sample, increasing the percentage of high-risk subjects. In the latter case, new BP and cLDL goals (<130/80 mmHg and <100 mg/dl) should be needed in 475 (7.4%) and 413 (6.4%) additional subjects, respectively. CONCLUSION: Inclusion of the ORF resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of subjects with estimated high cardiovascular risk.

[Prevalence and related factors of overweight and obesity in Spanish population aged 60 years-old or older. The PREV-ICTUS study]. / Prevalencia de sobrepeso y obesidad en población española de 60 años o más y factores relacionados. Estudio PREV-ICTUS.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Data on the prevalence of obesity in elderly population in Spain are scarce. The objective of this work was to describe the prevalence of obesity and the related factors in a random sample of Spanish population aged 60 years-old or more, stratified by autonomous communities. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We analyzed the PREV-ICTUS study, a population-based study carried out between September and December 2005 in a random sample stratified by autonomous communities according to the census of inhabitants and the habitat in each community. Subjects were classified as with normal weight (body mass index [BMI] < 25 kg), overweight (BMI 25-29.9) and obesity (BMI > or = 30 kg). RESULTS: In 6,843 subjects -mean age (standard deviation): 71.9 (7.1) years-old; 53.3% women-, prevalence of obesity was 34.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.3-35.5%), higher in women (38.4%; 95% CI, 36.8-39.9%) than in men (30.0%; 95% CI, 28.4-31.6%; p < 0.001), with a tendency to decrease in the older population. In total, 81.7% of the population showed overweight (BMI > or = 25). Prevalence differed among communities from 46.4% to 20.7% (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, obesity was inversely related to age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98 per each year increment), and directly to female gender (OR = 1.25), rural (OR = 1.50) or semi-urban habitat (OR = 1.38), sedentary lifestyle (OR = 1.86) and non-smoking history (OR = 1.19). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity was present in one out of 3 individuals of this reasonably representative sample of the Spanish population in an age range, 60 years-old or more, which concentrates a high cardiovascular risk. Differences in the prevalence among autonomus communities were detected.

Independent impact of obesity and fat distribution in hypertension prevalence and control in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Studies on the impact of weight excess and fat distribution on blood pressure are usually limited to young and middle-aged population, and data on the elderly are scarce. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed an analysis of the Prevencion de Riesgo de Ictus, a population-based study on individuals aged 60 years or more in Spain, to assess the impact of weight excess, stratified by body mass index (normal <25; overweight 25-29.9; obesity > or =30 kg/m), and waist circumference [increased if > or =88 cm (women) or > or =102 (men)] on the prevalence on hypertension and lack of blood pressure control. In 6263 individuals (mean age 71.9 years old, 53.3% women; 73.0% with diagnosed hypertension), prevalence of obesity was 35.0%, and 65.6% showed an increased waist circumference. Body mass index and waist circumference showed an independent impact on the prevalence and absence of hypertension control. In a multivariate model including age, sex, body mass index, and waist circumference, prevalence of hypertension was higher in the overweight and obesity groups (odds ratio 1.41 and 1.96, respectively, compared to normal weight), and in those with increased waist circumference (odds ratio 1.25) compared with normal waist circumference. After further adjustment for antihypertensive therapy, overweight, and obesity (odds ratio 1.40 and 1.59, respectively) as well as increased waist circumference (odds ratio 1.39) were independently related to absence of blood pressure control. The impact of waist circumference on hypertension and blood pressure control was shown in each category of body mass index. CONCLUSION: In this cross-sectional study in an elderly population, body mass index and waist circumference showed an independent and direct impact on the prevalence of hypertension and on the absence of blood pressure control.

Prevalencia de sobrepeso y obesidad en población española de 60 años o más y factores relacionados. Estudio PREV-ICTUS / Prevalence and related factors of overweight and obesity in Spanish population aged 60 years-old or older. The PREV-ICTUS study

FUNDAMENTO Y OBJETIVO: Los datos sobre prevalencia de obesidad en población de edad avanzadaen España son escasos. El objetivo de este trabajo ha sido describir la prevalencia de obesidady los factores relacionados en una muestra aleatoria de la población española de 60 años o más, estratificada por comunidades autónomas (CC.AA.).SUJETOS Y MÉTODO: Se analizó el estudio PREV-ICTUS, realizado en una muestra seleccionadaaleatoriamente entre septiembre y diciembre de 2005, estratificada por CC.AA. según el censo yel hábitat de atención. Se clasificó a los sujetos según su índice de masa corporal (IMC) enaquellos con peso normal (IMC < 25), sobrepeso (IMC de 25-29,9) y obesos (IMC 30).RESULTADOS: En 6.843 sujetos –edad media (desviación estándar) de 71,9 (7,1) años; 53,3%mujeres– la prevalencia de obesidad fue del 34,5% (intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%, 33,3-35,5%), mayor en mujeres (38,4%; IC del 95%, 36,8-39,9%) que en varones (30,0%; IC del95%, 28,4-31,6%; p < 0,001), con tendencia a disminuir en edades más avanzadas. En total,el 81,7% mostró exceso ponderal (IMC 25). La prevalencia varió entre las CC.AA., del 46,4al 20,7% (p < 0,001). En el análisis multivariante, la obesidad guardó una relación inversa conla edad (odds ratio [OR] = 0,98 por cada incremento en un año) y directa con el sexo femenino(OR = 1,25), el medio rural (OR = 1,50) o semiurbano (OR = 1,38), el sedentarismo (OR =1,86) y el antecedente de no fumador (OR = 1,19).CONCLUSIONES: La obesidad estuvo presente en uno de cada 3 individuos en esta muestra razonablementerepresentativa de la población española de un intervalo de edad, 60 años o más, que ademásconcentra un gran riesgo cardiovascular. Se observaron diferencias en la prevalencia entre las CC.AA

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Data on the prevalence of obesity in elderly population in Spain are scarce. The objective of this work was to describe the prevalence of obesity and the related factors in a random sample of Spanish population aged 60 years-old or more, stratified by autonomous communities. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We analyzed the PREV-ICTUS study, a population-based study carried out between September and December 2005 in a random sample stratified by autonomous communities according to the census of inhabitants and the habitat in each community. Subjects were classified as with normal weight (body mass index [BMI] < 25 kg), overweight (BMI 25-29.9) and obesity (BMI 30 kg). RESULTS: In 6,843 subjects –mean age (standard deviation): 71.9 (7.1) years-old; 53.3% women–, prevalence of obesity was 34.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33.3-35.5%), higher in women (38.4%; 95% CI, 36.8-39.9%) than in men (30.0%; 95% CI, 28.4-31.6%; p < 0.001), with a tendency to decrease in the older population. In total, 81.7% of the population showed overweight (BMI 25). Prevalence differed among communities from 46.4% to 20.7% (p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, obesity was inversely related to age (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98 per each year increment), and directly to female gender (OR = 1.25), rural (OR = 1.50) or semiurban habitat (OR = 1.38), sedentary lifestyle (OR = 1.86) and non-smoking history (OR = 1.19). CONCLUSIONS: Obesity was present in one out of 3 individuals of this reasonably representative sample of the Spanish population in an age range, 60 years-old or more, which concentrates a high cardiovascular risk. Differences in the prevalence among autonomus communities were detected

Evaluación y tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial en España. Documento de consenso / No disponible

No disponible

Serum lipid profiles and their relationship to cardiovascular disease in the elderly: the PREV-ICTUS study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between different serum lipid profiles and the prevalence of established cardiovascular disease (CVD) in an elderly population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: An analysis was undertaken of the PREV-ICTUS population-based study on Spanish subjects aged > or =60 years. The following definitions were used: abnormal LDL cholesterol (LDL-C): > or =130 mg/dl (> or =3.3 mmol/L), or > or =100 mg/dl (> or =2.5 mmol/L) in those with diabetes or CVD, or treatment with any hypolipidaemic drug; low HDL cholesterol (HDL-C): <40 mg/dl (<1 mmol/L) (men), or <50 mg/dl (<1.3 mmol/L) (women), and abnormal triglycerides (TG): > or =150 mg/dl (> or =1.7 mmol/L) or treatment with fibrates. We defined eight groups: A (normal lipid profile), B (isolated abnormal LDL-C), C (isolated abnormal TG), D (isolated low HDL-C), E (abnormal LDL-C and HDL-C), F (abnormal LDL-C and TG), G (abnormal TG and HDL-C), H (abnormal LDL-C, HDL-C and TG). A multivariate analysis was performed to assess the relationship between each lipid profile and CVD. RESULTS: A total of 6010 subjects (mean age 71.7 years, 53.5% women, 73.2% with hypertension, 29.2% with diabetes mellitus, 24.3% with CVD), were included in the analysis. LDL-C elevation was present in 78.1%, 23.3% had low HDL-C and 35.7% abnormal TG. Combined dyslipidaemias were frequent (40.3%). Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for CVD, compared with those with a normal lipid profile, were 2.07 (1.24-3.46) for abnormal HDL-C (p = 0.005), 4.09 (3.10-5.39) for abnormal LDL-C; 6.41 (4.59-8.95) for abnormal LDL-C plus HDL-C, 5.33 (3.98-7.14) for abnormal LDL-C plus TG and 7.59 (5.51-10.5) for those with the three parameters altered (all p < 0.001). Compared with those with isolated LDL-C elevation, those with abnormal LDL-C plus HDL-C had 1.57 (1.30-1.97) higher odds of having CVD (p < 0.001), the figures being 1.30 (1.11-1.53) for those with abnormal LDL-C plus TG and 1.86 (1.52-2.28) for those with abnormal LDL-C, TG plus HDL-C (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lipid abnormalities are frequent in the elderly, and are associated with the presence of CVD. Low HDL-C and/or abnormal TG levels, when added to abnormal LDL-C, are associated with a higher prevalence of CVD, suggesting the advisability of a comprehensive lipid evaluation and treatment earlier in life.